Loaded data file C:\Users\zirbel\Documents\JAR3D\\HL\3.48\diagnostic\HL_RandomMotifSequencesNonCan_1.mat
CGAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.45, deficit  1.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  83.94, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.98, deficit  2.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.31, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GCUC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_22447.1,  4 NTs,                UUUUCA,score      -5.90, deficit  0.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  65.29, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s53-s55                         
CCCG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.67, deficit  0.85, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  59.50, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
GAAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.19, deficit  1.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  86.61, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GUCC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.03, deficit  0.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  97.89, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
GAAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.19, deficit  1.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  86.61, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
AUCU 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.05, deficit  0.22, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  97.66, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CGAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.45, deficit  1.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  83.94, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GUUC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.54, deficit  0.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.51, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CCAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.45, deficit  1.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  52.36, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
GAGC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -5.08, deficit  2.16, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  77.27, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.45, deficit  1.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  83.94, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
UUUA 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.55, deficit  0.72, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.42, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CGGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -6.15, deficit  2.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.45, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
UGGA 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_22447.1,  4 NTs,                UUUUCA,score      -8.00, deficit  2.40, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.20, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s53-s55                         
CGGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -6.15, deficit  2.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.45, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
CUCG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -3.83, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
AUCU 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.05, deficit  0.22, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  97.66, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
UGGG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_22447.1,  4 NTs,                UUUUCA,score      -9.72, deficit  4.11, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  25.11, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s53-s55                         
GGGC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -6.10, deficit  2.32, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.01, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
UGGG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_22447.1,  4 NTs,                UUUUCA,score      -9.72, deficit  4.11, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  25.11, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s53-s55                         
GCCC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.88, deficit  1.05, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  57.39, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
GGAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.98, deficit  2.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.31, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GAAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.19, deficit  1.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  86.61, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.98, deficit  2.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.31, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.98, deficit  2.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.31, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CCAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.45, deficit  1.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  52.36, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
CCCG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.67, deficit  0.85, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  59.50, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CAAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -3.66, deficit  0.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.24, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
UUUG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -6.56, deficit  2.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  71.18, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
GGAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.98, deficit  2.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.31, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGGC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -6.10, deficit  2.32, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.01, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
GUUC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.54, deficit  0.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.51, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CCAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.45, deficit  1.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  52.36, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.98, deficit  2.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.31, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CAAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -3.66, deficit  0.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.24, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.45, deficit  1.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  83.94, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GCCC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.88, deficit  1.05, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  57.39, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CUUG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.34, deficit  0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  94.62, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
GGAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.98, deficit  2.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.31, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
UUUG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -6.56, deficit  2.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  71.18, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
AUUU 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.56, deficit  0.73, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.29, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
AAAU 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.21, deficit  1.29, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  86.44, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
AGAU 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -5.00, deficit  2.08, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.14, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.98, deficit  2.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.31, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUCG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -3.83, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
GUUC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.54, deficit  0.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.51, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
GAGC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -5.08, deficit  2.16, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  77.27, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
UGAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -6.84, deficit  3.92, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  58.75, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GAGAC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -4.94, deficit  1.23, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  87.03, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CAUCG 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -5.32, deficit  1.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  51.48, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
CAAAG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -3.71, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGUGG 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_05667.1,  3 NTs,                 GGUAC,score      -5.45, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-s55                                 
UUGCA 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_60914.1,  4 NTs,                 CUGGG,score      -4.89, deficit  1.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.98, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CUCCG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_53189.1,  5 NTs,                 CUCUG,score      -4.71, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s53                     
CGGAG 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_05667.1,  3 NTs,                 GGUAC,score      -4.35, deficit  0.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  67.64, ed 99, 1 cWW-s55                                 
GACAC 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -4.94, deficit  1.23, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.46, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGGAG 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_05667.1,  3 NTs,                 GGUAC,score      -4.35, deficit  0.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  67.64, ed 99, 1 cWW-s55                                 
CGUGG 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_05667.1,  3 NTs,                 GGUAC,score      -5.45, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-s55                                 
GACGC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_61984.1,  3 NTs,                 CUCGG,score      -5.74, deficit  1.73, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  50.23, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
CAGAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -4.81, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  88.44, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
UGUGG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_95237.1,  4 NTs,                 UUUGA,score      -6.21, deficit  2.49, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  42.21, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s35                         
CUGUG 1  Matches 27; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -3.43, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
UGAGA 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_05692.1,  3 NTs,                CGUAGG,score      -7.80, deficit  1.87, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.69, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGUAG 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_05667.1,  3 NTs,                 GGUAC,score      -4.35, deficit  0.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  99.22, ed 99, 0 cWW-s55                                 
GACAC 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -4.94, deficit  1.23, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.46, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
UUAUG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -5.78, deficit  2.35, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  75.29, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GCUCC 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_70970.1,  5 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -5.32, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F-s35                             
GGAAC 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.91, deficit  0.73, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.32, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
GUUUC 1  Matches 29; best is  HL_33507.2,  4 NTs,                 UUUUA,score      -3.11, deficit  0.14, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.51, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F-s55                           
GGAGC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_05692.1,  3 NTs,                CGUAGG,score      -7.79, deficit  1.87, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.78, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
GCUUC 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_70970.1,  5 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -5.32, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F-s35                             
AUCCU 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_80171.1,  5 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -4.34, deficit  1.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.98, ed 99, 1 cWW-s53-s35-s35-s33                     
CAAGG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_94352.4,  5 NTs,               CUAAGUG,score      -5.94, deficit  0.91, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  58.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-F-F                         
CGAAG 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.55, deficit  0.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  96.13, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
GUCUC 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -3.78, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F                               
CAAAG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -3.71, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUUUG 1  Matches 29; best is  HL_33507.2,  4 NTs,                 UUUUA,score      -3.09, deficit  0.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.65, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F-s55                           
CAGAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -4.81, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  88.44, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUAUG 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -3.69, deficit  0.25, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  97.35, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
UUAUA 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -3.82, deficit  0.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  95.94, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUAUG 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -3.69, deficit  0.25, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  97.35, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGAAC 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.91, deficit  0.73, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.32, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
UGAGG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_90197.1,  5 NTs,                UGUAGG,score      -5.75, deficit  2.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.18, ed 99, 1 cWW-s55-s35                             
CUGCG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_60914.1,  4 NTs,                 CUGGG,score      -4.81, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CUUUG 1  Matches 29; best is  HL_33507.2,  4 NTs,                 UUUUA,score      -3.09, deficit  0.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.65, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F-s55                           
GUCUC 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -3.78, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F                               
CAAAG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -3.71, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CAGAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -4.81, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  88.44, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
AUGUU 1  Matches 27; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -3.57, deficit  0.14, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.53, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGAAC 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.91, deficit  0.73, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.32, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
UGAAG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -6.00, deficit  2.82, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  70.35, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
GUGUC 1  Matches 27; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -3.61, deficit  0.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.10, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGAGG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_05692.1,  3 NTs,                CGUAGG,score      -7.71, deficit  1.79, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  49.56, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
GUACC 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -4.96, deficit  1.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  52.31, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
GUUUC 1  Matches 29; best is  HL_33507.2,  4 NTs,                 UUUUA,score      -3.11, deficit  0.14, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.51, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F-s55                           
ACCAU 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_99223.1,  4 NTs,                 UUUAA,score      -4.17, deficit  0.63, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  93.41, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-s55-s35                         
CCCCG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_12703.2,  5 NTs,                 GGCCC,score      -6.09, deficit  1.66, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  50.92, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
UGAAA 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.97, deficit  0.79, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  91.70, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
AGGAAU 1  Matches 29; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -9.96, deficit  6.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  31.31, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
UUUCCA 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_46463.1,  4 NTs,                UUUCGA,score      -5.06, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CGAAAG 1  Matches 32; best is  HL_06569.1,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -6.07, deficit  0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  94.63, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35                 
CGUCAG 1  Matches 31; best is  HL_02906.1,  5 NTs,                UGUAAG,score      -8.59, deficit  1.52, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  52.43, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s35                 
CGUCAG 1  Matches 31; best is  HL_02906.1,  5 NTs,                UGUAAG,score      -8.59, deficit  1.52, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  52.43, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s35                 
ACAAUU 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_96776.2,  6 NTs,                AAAAUU,score      -5.55, deficit  0.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  66.66, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-F                   
CCGGAG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_18218.2,  6 NTs,             GCCUAGGAC,score      -6.72, deficit -0.59, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.06, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-bif-F-F-s35                     
CGAAGG 1  Matches 24; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -4.60, deficit  2.85, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  70.46, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
AUGGUU 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_32617.1,  5 NTs,                UUGGUA,score      -3.98, deficit  0.24, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  97.49, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-cSH                             
GGCAAC 1  Matches 31; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -4.18, deficit  2.43, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  74.83, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
CGAGAG 1  Matches 30; best is  HL_04891.1,  6 NTs,                CGAGAG,score      -5.08, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
CACGAG 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_86880.4,  5 NTs,               GCUCGUC,score      -5.92, deficit  0.72, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.42, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35                     
GGAUAC 1  Matches 32; best is  HL_28567.3,  6 NTs,                GAGUAC,score      -5.04, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  68.42, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
UGGGGA 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_68304.6,  6 NTs,               CGACGAG,score      -7.41, deficit  1.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  53.76, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
GGUGAC 1  Matches 28; best is  HL_16898.2,  5 NTs,               UGAAAGG,score      -5.75, deficit  0.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  97.21, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s55                 
CAAGAG 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_86880.4,  5 NTs,               GCUCGUC,score      -6.08, deficit  0.89, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  90.66, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35                     
CAGGAG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_28567.3,  6 NTs,                GAGUAC,score      -5.97, deficit  0.92, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  58.69, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
CAGAAG 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_68304.6,  6 NTs,               CGACGAG,score      -6.70, deficit  0.69, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  61.17, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
CAAAAG 1  Matches 32; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -5.41, deficit  3.66, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  62.06, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
CUCGUG 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_86880.4,  5 NTs,               GCUCGUC,score      -5.45, deficit  0.25, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  65.78, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35                     
AGGUAU 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_35894.3,  6 NTs,                UAGUAA,score      -4.51, deficit  0.67, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  62.99, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cSW-s33-F-s35                   
CGCUAG 1  Matches 28; best is  HL_79299.9,  5 NTs,                CUUCGG,score      -8.88, deficit  7.03, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.44, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s53-s55             
CGUAAG 1  Matches 36; best is  HL_02361.5,  6 NTs,               UGAACAA,score      -6.69, deficit  1.55, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  83.70, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35                 
CCCAAG 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_69941.1,  4 NTs,                CGCGUG,score      -5.84, deficit  0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  63.04, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
AGAAAU 1  Matches 31; best is  HL_06569.1,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -6.07, deficit  0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  94.62, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35                 
CCGCCG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_96776.2,  6 NTs,                AAAAUU,score      -7.43, deficit  2.04, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.32, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-F                   
GCUAAC 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_02906.1,  5 NTs,                UGUAAG,score      -8.51, deficit  1.44, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  53.27, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s35                 
GGGUGC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_68304.6,  6 NTs,               CGACGAG,score      -8.40, deficit  2.38, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.36, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
AUUAUU 1  Matches 28; best is  HL_96283.1,  3 NTs,                CUUAUG,score      -4.55, deficit  0.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.99, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUGUCG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_68529.1,  3 NTs,                GAGUCC,score      -4.94, deficit  1.05, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  88.97, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGGGGG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_68304.6,  6 NTs,               CGACGAG,score      -7.29, deficit  1.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.04, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
CUCUCG 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_76360.1,  5 NTs,                GUGUCC,score      -5.56, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
CGAAAG 1  Matches 32; best is  HL_06569.1,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -6.07, deficit  0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  94.63, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35                 
AUGGCU 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_76360.1,  5 NTs,                GUGUCC,score      -5.57, deficit  1.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.98, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
CUGUUG 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_58912.1,  4 NTs,                CUGUUG,score      -3.06, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-F                           
CUUAUG 1  Matches 30; best is  HL_96283.1,  3 NTs,                CUUAUG,score      -4.45, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
AAUUCU 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_30541.1,  5 NTs,                CAUUCG,score      -4.49, deficit  0.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.99, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F-F                             
UGAUAG 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_68304.6,  6 NTs,               CGACGAG,score      -8.17, deficit  2.16, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  45.71, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
CUAGCG 1  Matches 15; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -6.17, deficit  4.41, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  54.24, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
GUCUUC 1  Matches 27; best is  HL_00996.1,  5 NTs,                GUCUUC,score      -3.85, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35                 
UCCUUG 1  Matches  8; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score     -16.01, deficit 14.25, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  -0.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
CGGAGG 1  Matches 17; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -7.16, deficit  5.40, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.98, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
GUUCUC 1  Matches 33; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score     -10.28, deficit  7.35, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.58, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGACGC 1  Matches 17; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -9.14, deficit  7.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  23.41, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
AUAGCU 1  Matches 13; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -7.72, deficit  5.96, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  38.20, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
GUGACC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_76360.1,  5 NTs,                GUGUCC,score      -5.49, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
CUCGCG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_01472.3,  6 NTs,               GUCCGGC,score      -8.13, deficit  3.97, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.82, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSW-F-s55-s53                   
CGAAGG 1  Matches 24; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -4.60, deficit  2.85, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  70.46, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
AAACAU 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_01008.4,  5 NTs,                GAUCAC,score      -3.62, deficit  0.90, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  91.24, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s35-F                       
CGGUGG 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_68304.6,  6 NTs,               CGACGAG,score      -8.13, deficit  2.12, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  46.12, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
GAAAAGC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_35491.2,  7 NTs,               GAAACAC,score      -4.50, deficit  1.02, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  64.23, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s55-s35-s35                 
CGAUCAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_50959.1,  6 NTs,               UGAUGAG,score      -7.83, deficit  3.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  40.60, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35                     
GGUAUGC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_83225.1,  4 NTs,               CGUAUUG,score      -6.42, deficit  1.68, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.70, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
GGCGCGC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_62604.1,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -8.08, deficit  1.93, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  16.49, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s53-s53-s35                 
GGGUUAC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_84050.1,  6 NTs,              CCAGUUAG,score     -10.55, deficit  4.95, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.90, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-cSH-s55                     
CGUGAAG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_02906.1,  5 NTs,                UGUAAG,score      -9.28, deficit  2.21, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  45.13, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s35                 
UUGAACA 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_06645.1,  6 NTs,              CUUCAACG,score      -8.25, deficit  3.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.48, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-F-F-s35                     
UGCUCAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_50959.1,  6 NTs,               UGAUGAG,score      -6.85, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  21.25, ed 99, 2 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35                     
CGGGGGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_44730.2,  4 NTs,                CCUUGG,score      -7.94, deficit  2.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  11.94, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
GUAUCUC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_30937.1,  6 NTs,               GUAACGC,score      -6.18, deficit  1.95, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  53.55, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35                     
CCUGAAG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_93229.1,  5 NTs,               CCUUGAG,score      -6.99, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.34, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35                 
UUGGUCA 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_25183.1,  4 NTs,               CUGUUCG,score      -6.19, deficit  0.59, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  62.17, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35                                 
UUCAGCG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_06645.1,  6 NTs,              CUUCAACG,score     -10.26, deficit  5.21, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.22, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-F-F-s35                     
GGCCCGC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_32512.6,  7 NTs,               GACUGGC,score      -7.62, deficit  2.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  50.37, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
CUAAAUG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_24403.1,  6 NTs,               GAAAAUC,score      -6.26, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35                     
CUAAGUG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_94352.4,  5 NTs,               CUAAGUG,score      -5.03, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-F-F                         
UAAUGAA 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_50959.1,  6 NTs,               UGAUGAG,score      -7.12, deficit  2.47, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  47.43, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35                     
CAGAGAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_28567.3,  6 NTs,                GAGUAC,score      -7.67, deficit  2.63, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  40.75, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
GGGAAAC 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_68304.6,  6 NTs,               CGACGAG,score      -7.31, deficit  1.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  54.75, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
CGAACAG 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_02361.5,  6 NTs,               UGAACAA,score      -5.14, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35                 
CGUUUAG 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_94651.1,  7 NTs,              CGUUCUAG,score      -7.93, deficit  3.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  53.88, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSS-s35-s55                 
UUAGCCA 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_43610.4,  7 NTs,               GGAGACC,score      -8.24, deficit  4.83, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  29.23, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-s35           
GUGGAUC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_68493.4,  7 NTs,              CUGGGAUG,score      -8.53, deficit  3.96, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  40.21, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35         
GUUUGCC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_01472.3,  6 NTs,               GUCCGGC,score      -6.62, deficit  2.46, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.77, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSW-F-s55-s53                   
UGCCGAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_43527.1,  6 NTs,               CGCCGAG,score      -8.81, deficit  2.91, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  69.32, ed 99, 0 cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
AGCGAAU 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_18218.2,  6 NTs,             GCCUAGGAC,score      -9.23, deficit  1.92, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.23, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-bif-F-F-s35                     
GAAGGAC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_04891.1,  6 NTs,                CGAGAG,score      -6.09, deficit  1.01, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  57.78, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
CUGUAUG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_55046.1,  5 NTs,               GUUUAUC,score      -5.69, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  64.31, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s55                         
CGUUGAG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_49196.2,  6 NTs,             AUUCCCAUU,score      -9.70, deficit  3.77, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  69.05, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-cWW-s33-s55-s35                 
GUUCGUC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_01472.3,  6 NTs,               GUCCGGC,score      -5.77, deficit  1.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  63.48, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSW-F-s55-s53                   
CUGAUUG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_83225.1,  4 NTs,               CGUAUUG,score      -6.93, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.48, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
CAAAGAG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_49816.1,  6 NTs,              GAAAGACC,score      -7.29, deficit  2.38, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.87, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s55-s33                         
GUAACCC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_30937.1,  6 NTs,               GUAACGC,score      -5.66, deficit  1.44, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  58.35, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35                     
UUUGUCA 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_16845.5,  5 NTs,               CUUAUCG,score      -6.51, deficit  1.69, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.80, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35                 
CCGAACG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_69774.3,  6 NTs,               GAAACAC,score      -8.02, deficit  3.76, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  28.85, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-tSW-s35-s35-s35                 
CUUGAUG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_55046.1,  5 NTs,               GUUUAUC,score      -5.69, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  64.31, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s55                         
UGUUCAA 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_49196.2,  6 NTs,             AUUCCCAUU,score      -8.28, deficit  2.35, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.04, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-s33-s55-s35                 
GGAUAGC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_59445.1,  7 NTs,               CAAUAGG,score      -6.17, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  59.48, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-F-s35-s35                   
UGCUGAA 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_18218.2,  6 NTs,             GCCUAGGAC,score      -8.15, deficit  0.83, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  59.65, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-bif-F-F-s35                     
CGAAUAG 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_02361.5,  6 NTs,               UGAACAA,score      -5.14, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35                 
CGGGCGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_62604.1,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -8.06, deficit  1.92, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  16.63, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s53-s53-s35                 
GGAACAC 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_02361.5,  6 NTs,               UGAACAA,score      -5.36, deficit  0.21, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  97.78, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35                 
UAAAAAA 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_24403.1,  6 NTs,               GAAAAUC,score      -6.28, deficit  1.19, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.85, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35                     
AUUGAUU 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_55046.1,  5 NTs,               GUUUAUC,score      -5.70, deficit  1.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  64.24, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s55                         
GAUGCAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_96487.1,  4 NTs,               CAUGUAG,score      -7.79, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
CGCAGGG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_86880.4,  5 NTs,               GCUCGUC,score     -10.11, deficit  4.91, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  16.70, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35                     
AUUGUCU 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_16845.5,  5 NTs,               CUUAUCG,score      -6.51, deficit  1.69, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.80, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35                 
CGAGUGG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_02361.5,  6 NTs,               UGAACAA,score     -10.17, deficit  5.03, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.51, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35                 
CAAAAAG 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_27747.3,  6 NTs,               AGAAAUU,score      -4.77, deficit  0.76, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  60.37, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s53-s55-cSH         
GGUGACGC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_93727.3,  8 NTs,              GGUGGCUC,score      -6.53, deficit  0.75, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  64.60, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
CCCGGAAG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_97733.1,  8 NTs,            CCCGGUCAGG,score     -13.14, deficit  5.05, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  14.69, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s55         
CGAGGAGG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_49194.1,  7 NTs,              GGACGAUC,score      -8.99, deficit  4.19, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  24.53, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35                 
GAAGGCCC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_93551.1,  8 NTs,              CAUGGACG,score      -9.18, deficit  2.32, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.79, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s53-F-s35-s35-s55               
UUGUUCCA 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_25183.1,  4 NTs,               CUGUUCG,score     -10.46, deficit  4.87, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  17.15, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35                                 
CGUAGAAG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_92681.4,  7 NTs,              UGAAGAAG,score      -5.43, deficit  1.85, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  58.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
UUUCUACA 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_06645.1,  6 NTs,              CUUCAACG,score      -6.23, deficit  1.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  68.39, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-F-F-s35                     
CUAUUUCG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_84050.1,  6 NTs,              CCAGUUAG,score      -9.05, deficit  3.45, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  12.32, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-cSH-s55                     
GGCUCAAC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_94651.1,  7 NTs,              CGUUCUAG,score      -9.02, deficit  4.60, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  24.90, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSS-s35-s55                 
UUUAAAUA 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_54035.5,  7 NTs,              AUUGAGUU,score      -5.41, deficit  1.14, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  65.32, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35         
CUAAUCCG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_16845.5,  5 NTs,               CUUAUCG,score     -10.60, deficit  5.77, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.15, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35                 
CGUGUCAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_86769.2,  7 NTs,              AGGGUCAU,score      -7.92, deficit  0.44, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  70.25, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSH-s55         
CGAGACAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_66171.2,  5 NTs,              CGACACAG,score      -5.31, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  64.54, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
UACCUGGG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_32512.6,  7 NTs,               GACUGGC,score     -10.72, deficit  5.36, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  21.20, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
CUCCUCUG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_80705.1,  7 NTs,             CUCCUCGCG,score     -10.91, deficit  5.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.05, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tWW-s35-s35-s53-s55         
CGACAUGG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_46142.7,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score      -9.02, deficit  1.43, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  21.83, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
CAAAUUGG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_46142.7,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score      -8.99, deficit  1.40, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.11, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
CAGUCUCG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_17899.1,  8 NTs,              GUGUCUAC,score      -7.64, deficit  3.88, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.95, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-tSW-s35-s35-s35         
CGCCAAAG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_35888.1,  7 NTs,              AGGCAAUU,score      -7.64, deficit  2.29, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.07, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-s35-s35               
CUUUAAUG 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_92681.4,  7 NTs,              UGAAGAAG,score     -11.13, deficit  7.55, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  35.99, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
AUUGAUUU 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_54035.5,  7 NTs,              AUUGAGUU,score      -5.78, deficit  1.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  62.25, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35         
GGCAAGGC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_46142.7,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score      -7.39, deficit -0.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
CGUGGAAG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_93551.1,  8 NTs,              CAUGGACG,score      -9.26, deficit  2.40, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.17, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s53-F-s35-s35-s55               
CUAGAUCG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_93436.1,  7 NTs,             GUUCGAUCC,score     -10.44, deficit  4.77, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.56, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-F-s35-s35                       
CUGAUACG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_93727.3,  8 NTs,              GGUGGCUC,score     -11.63, deficit  5.84, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  16.47, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
CGACGAGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_49194.1,  7 NTs,              GGACGAUC,score      -7.89, deficit  3.09, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  54.89, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35                 
CUCGGAUG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_68493.4,  7 NTs,              CUGGGAUG,score     -10.18, deficit  5.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  25.99, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35         
CAGCAGAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_48810.1,  7 NTs,           CAGCUGGUUAG,score     -12.16, deficit  4.84, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  31.42, ed 99, 2 cWW-s55-s35-s35-F                       
CGCCAUAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_90961.1,  4 NTs,               CGCAUAG,score      -8.78, deficit  3.98, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  34.35, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s55                     
CAUAGCCG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_93551.1,  8 NTs,              CAUGGACG,score      -9.57, deficit  2.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  34.85, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s53-F-s35-s35-s55               
UUAGCGUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_01181.4,  7 NTs,              GCACCGUC,score     -12.31, deficit  5.98, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  17.67, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35         
AAACUCAU 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_86769.2,  7 NTs,              AGGGUCAU,score      -7.78, deficit  0.29, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  71.48, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSH-s55         
CGAGUGGG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_32512.6,  7 NTs,               GACUGGC,score      -8.07, deficit  2.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  17.87, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
UGAGCGGA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_01181.4,  7 NTs,              GCACCGUC,score     -10.69, deficit  4.35, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   8.22, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CUGUUUUG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_17899.1,  8 NTs,              GUGUCUAC,score      -7.64, deficit  3.88, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.95, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-tSW-s35-s35-s35         
UGAUGCGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_09712.1,  7 NTs,              UUCUGCGG,score      -7.93, deficit  3.50, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  42.11, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-F                           
AUUGAAUU 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_68493.4,  7 NTs,              CUGGGAUG,score      -5.84, deficit  1.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  63.32, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35         
UGAGAGAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_48636.1,  6 NTs,             UGUGAGAGG,score      -9.93, deficit  3.40, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  34.62, ed 99, 2 cWW-s53-F-cWH-s55                       
UACCCUAA 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_86769.2,  7 NTs,              AGGGUCAU,score      -8.76, deficit  1.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  36.98, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSH-s55         
GGUGAAAC 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_93727.3,  8 NTs,              GGUGGCUC,score      -6.92, deficit  1.14, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  60.91, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
GCUUUUCC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_36207.1,  8 NTs,             CCUUUCACG,score     -10.56, deficit  4.57, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.61, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s35-s35-s33-s55     
CAUAUCGG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_02906.1,  5 NTs,                UGUAAG,score      -9.98, deficit  2.91, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.84, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s35                 
CGCUUCGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_09712.1,  7 NTs,              UUCUGCGG,score      -8.71, deficit  4.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.33, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-F                           
GGAAGGGC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_46142.7,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score      -7.97, deficit  0.38, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  32.87, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
CGUAGAAG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_92681.4,  7 NTs,              UGAAGAAG,score      -5.43, deficit  1.85, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  58.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
CAGCGCAG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_48810.1,  7 NTs,           CAGCUGGUUAG,score     -12.61, deficit  5.29, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  28.56, ed 99, 2 cWW-s55-s35-s35-F                       
UGAAGGGA 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_46142.7,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score      -8.34, deficit  0.75, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  28.99, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
GGAUCUGC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_94651.1,  7 NTs,              CGUUCUAG,score      -6.99, deficit  2.57, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  39.28, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSS-s35-s55                 
UUAGGACA 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_93551.1,  8 NTs,              CAUGGACG,score      -9.19, deficit  2.32, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.73, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s53-F-s35-s35-s55               
CGACAAGG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_35888.1,  7 NTs,              AGGCAAUU,score      -7.64, deficit  2.29, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.07, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-s35-s35               
GUCCUAUUC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_37846.1,  7 NTs,            CUCCUCGCUG,score     -11.39, deficit  3.73, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  13.24, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tWW-s35-s35-s53-s55             
UGUGGAGAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_48636.1,  6 NTs,             UGUGAGAGG,score      -8.54, deficit  2.01, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.30, ed 99, 2 cWW-s53-F-cWH-s55                       
GGCAAAAAC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46771.1,  7 NTs,             AUUGAAAAU,score      -7.90, deficit  0.48, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  24.85, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cSW-tSS-cSS-s55-s35             
GGUUAUGAC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_17926.4,  9 NTs,             UGUAAGUAA,score      -9.26, deficit  1.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  63.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CCCAAGCCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_99402.3, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score     -15.38, deficit  8.93, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  21.05, ed 99, 2 cWW-s33-s35-cSH-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35     
CUUCCGACG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_42733.3,  8 NTs,             CGGCGAAAG,score      -9.40, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  38.08, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CGGAAGAGG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_17926.4,  9 NTs,             UGUAAGUAA,score      -9.82, deficit  1.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  31.67, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
ACUCCCAUU 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_49196.2,  6 NTs,             AUUCCCAUU,score      -9.33, deficit  3.41, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  47.41, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-s33-s55-s35                 
GGAAAUGAC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_17926.4,  9 NTs,             UGUAAGUAA,score     -10.62, deficit  2.54, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  51.09, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
GGAUUGCAC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_99402.3, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score     -14.40, deficit  7.94, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  26.25, ed 99, 2 cWW-s33-s35-cSH-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35     
GGAUAAGAC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_17926.4,  9 NTs,             UGUAAGUAA,score     -10.11, deficit  2.03, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.60, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
UGGACGAGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_48636.1,  6 NTs,             UGUGAGAGG,score     -13.37, deficit  6.84, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  10.73, ed 99, 2 cWW-s53-F-cWH-s55                       
CGUGAGGAG 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_93727.3,  8 NTs,              GGUGGCUC,score      -9.89, deficit  4.11, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  32.85, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
CGUUGCCGG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_73793.2,  8 NTs,             GAUAAAAGC,score     -10.78, deficit  4.68, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  20.16, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35 
CGAGGACAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_05018.4,  8 NTs,             GAAGACCAC,score     -11.80, deficit  6.69, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   2.73, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
AGCGAAAAU 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_73266.3,  9 NTs,             ACCGUAAAU,score      -9.92, deficit  4.26, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.67, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-cSW-cSH-s55-s35-s35-s35 
AGGGAACAU 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_05018.4,  8 NTs,             GAAGACCAC,score      -9.45, deficit  4.34, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  17.29, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
GGUCAAAAC 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_46771.1,  7 NTs,             AUUGAAAAU,score      -7.98, deficit  0.56, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  47.99, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cSW-tSS-cSS-s55-s35             
CGUGAUUGG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_02811.1,  4 NTs,             AGGGAUUUU,score     -10.23, deficit  2.04, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  35.15, ed 99, 2 cWW-F-F                                 
CUAUGGGCG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_93551.1,  8 NTs,              CAUGGACG,score      -9.75, deficit  2.89, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.49, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s53-F-s35-s35-s55               
GGAUCGUGC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_61092.1,  7 NTs,            CAGUUGGGAG,score     -10.55, deficit  4.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  18.54, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-F-F                     
CACUACACG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_58200.1,  5 NTs,             CCUCACACG,score      -8.68, deficit  1.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  45.69, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s55                         
CUCCAUCCG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_05123.1,  9 NTs,            ACGGGGAGUU,score     -11.41, deficit  3.73, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  38.59, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
CAGAAUGAG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_05018.4,  8 NTs,             GAAGACCAC,score     -10.75, deficit  5.65, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.79, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
GUAUUCUCC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_36207.1,  8 NTs,             CCUUUCACG,score      -8.43, deficit  2.45, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  24.88, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s35-s35-s33-s55     
UGACUUUGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_99402.3, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score     -14.46, deficit  8.01, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  10.06, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-s35-cSH-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35     
CGAACUUAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_36421.4,  9 NTs,             AGUUCAUAU,score     -10.37, deficit  6.99, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  23.22, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35         
GGGUACAAC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_41851.1,  9 NTs,             CCUUACGAG,score     -11.06, deficit  5.50, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  21.66, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s33-s55-s35-s35-s35 
GAAGGAAAC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_76406.3,  9 NTs,             GACAGAGAC,score      -8.44, deficit  3.22, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  40.42, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s33-s53-s53-cWH-s55-s35         
GGUAAUCAC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_17926.4,  9 NTs,             UGUAAGUAA,score      -9.77, deficit  1.69, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  32.09, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
UCUCCGAUA 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_36552.1,  6 NTs,             CCUCCUAAG,score      -8.82, deficit  2.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  46.48, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s33-F-s55-F                     
GAACACCGC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_05018.4,  8 NTs,             GAAGACCAC,score      -9.58, deficit  4.47, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  35.09, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
GUGAAAAUC 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_08748.1,  9 NTs,             ACUCAUACU,score      -7.07, deficit  0.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  77.82, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-F-s35-s35
CUUGCGGUG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_18495.1,  8 NTs,             ACUGCAGAU,score     -10.55, deficit  4.44, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  23.01, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35             
GUGAAUCUC 1  Matches  4; best is HL_33239.14,  9 NTs,             GUUCGAUUC,score     -10.80, deficit  7.99, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  21.63, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35         
UGAAACGAA 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_05832.1,  7 NTs,             GCGAAAGAC,score      -9.94, deficit  3.60, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  34.14, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s55-s35     
CUUCGGUCG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_93436.1,  7 NTs,             GUUCGAUCC,score      -8.43, deficit  2.76, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  61.29, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F-s35-s35                       
GGUUAAAAC 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_72066.1,  8 NTs,             UGUUCAAAG,score      -8.28, deficit  3.31, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  62.48, ed 99, 1 cWW-s55-tWH-s33-F-s35-s35-s35           
GUGUAUCUC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_67044.1,  8 NTs,             AUGUCGUUU,score      -9.34, deficit  3.38, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  14.77, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s33-F-s35               
UGUCAAAAA 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_03427.1,  7 NTs,             UCUCAUAAG,score      -8.18, deficit  2.47, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  52.12, ed 99, 2 cWW-s55-s35-s35-s33                     
AGAAUUAGU 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_20743.2,  8 NTs,             GGAUAUGGC,score      -9.33, deficit  3.96, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  32.07, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-s55-s35         
GAAGGAAAC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_76406.3,  9 NTs,             GACAGAGAC,score      -8.44, deficit  3.22, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  40.42, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s33-s53-s53-cWH-s55-s35         
UGCUCCCAA 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_36421.4,  9 NTs,             AGUUCAUAU,score     -10.15, deficit  6.77, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  24.58, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CAAGGCACG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_78724.1,  8 NTs,             AAAAUCACU,score      -8.80, deficit  2.29, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.51, ed 99, 2 cWW-s53-s35-s35-s35                     
GGAGCCAAC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_68742.1,  8 NTs,             CUUGCCAAG,score      -8.75, deficit  2.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  47.55, ed 99, 2 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
CGAGCUGGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_20743.2,  8 NTs,             GGAUAUGGC,score     -10.57, deficit  5.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  23.63, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-s55-s35         
UUAGCAGUA 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_08002.5,  8 NTs,              GUAGAGUC,score     -12.01, deficit  8.14, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  20.71, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tWH-F-F-s35-s35                 
UGUAGAAGA 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_73793.2,  8 NTs,             GAUAAAAGC,score     -10.98, deficit  4.88, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  41.11, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35 
GUCUUUUUC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_67044.1,  8 NTs,             AUGUCGUUU,score      -9.34, deficit  3.38, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  14.77, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s33-F-s35               
GAAGCAGCC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18495.1,  8 NTs,             ACUGCAGAU,score     -11.18, deficit  5.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.43, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35             
CAAAUAAAAG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_24323.1, 10 NTs,            GAAGUGCAAC,score     -10.81, deficit  4.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  23.46, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-tWW-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35 
GACGUGCAGC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_24323.1, 10 NTs,            GAAGUGCAAC,score     -12.68, deficit  6.24, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  29.94, ed 99, 2 cWW-s33-tWW-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35 
CGAAUCAGAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_51284.1, 10 NTs,            GCAAGGAGAC,score     -10.45, deficit  3.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  20.66, ed 99, 3 cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35           
CGCGUCUAAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_94607.1,  7 NTs,           GGCUCAUAACC,score     -13.39, deficit  4.29, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  13.56, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-s53                   
UGUGCGAGAA 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_75091.3,  9 NTs,           GUUUGCGGGAC,score     -10.41, deficit  0.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.22, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CAGACGAUAG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_97049.1,  7 NTs,            CAGUCGGUAG,score     -11.04, deficit  1.41, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  51.88, ed 99, 2 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-cSH                     
UACAUGGGAA 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_53499.1,  4 NTs,            CAGCUGGGAG,score     -10.94, deficit  2.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  45.87, ed 99, 2 cWW-s55-F                               
GUUUGUCAUC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_32255.1, 10 NTs,            UUUUUUAAUG,score      -9.50, deficit  3.56, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.21, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s33-cWW-F-cSS-s53-s55-s35
UAAAAAAUAA 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_06048.1,  9 NTs,            CAAGAAAGAG,score      -8.58, deficit  0.66, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  51.73, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35 
CCUAGGGCAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_51284.1, 10 NTs,            GCAAGGAGAC,score     -10.45, deficit  3.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  20.66, ed 99, 3 cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35           
CGCAAAAAAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_63693.1,  8 NTs,            UGCAUAACAA,score     -10.04, deficit  2.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.29, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
UGAAUUGAAA 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_48376.3,  9 NTs,            CGUGUGGAAG,score      -9.70, deficit  2.38, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  63.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GAGUCACAAC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_87219.4, 10 NTs,           GAUUAGAUACC,score     -12.12, deficit  4.58, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  32.48, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
AUUGAAGGUU 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_30819.1,  8 NTs,            AUUGAGAGCU,score     -10.39, deficit  1.54, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  28.04, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cSH-s35-tSS-s55-s33-s53-s55     
CGGGGGUUGG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_52853.1,  6 NTs,           CAGGCGGUUAG,score     -13.71, deficit  3.65, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  20.46, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-s35-s35-F                       
CCGAUAUUCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_26501.1,  8 NTs,            CAGCUACUCG,score     -10.58, deficit  3.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  25.00, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-F-F                 
GUAAAACUUC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_90642.4,  7 NTs,            GUGAAGAUGC,score     -11.94, deficit  6.49, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   8.01, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35             
GGGAUAUAAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_66703.1,  7 NTs,             UGGCUAAAA,score     -11.81, deficit  5.12, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.29, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s53-s35         
GAAGGGCAAC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_24323.1, 10 NTs,            GAAGUGCAAC,score      -7.54, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  76.54, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-tWW-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35 
GCUGGAACCC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_87219.4, 10 NTs,           GAUUAGAUACC,score     -12.23, deficit  4.69, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  31.78, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GUUAAAAGUC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_78457.3,  8 NTs,            GUUAAUAUUC,score      -8.73, deficit  4.23, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.60, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35         
GAAUUCAACC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_96854.1,  9 NTs,            GACUCAACAC,score     -12.66, deficit  5.49, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   9.64, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s35                 
GGUCGAGAAC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_75091.3,  9 NTs,           GUUUGCGGGAC,score     -11.93, deficit  2.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  24.24, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
UAAGAUUUGA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_73235.1,  8 NTs,            CAGCACUUUG,score     -11.75, deficit  4.48, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   2.33, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-s55                   
CAAAGAGAGG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_49223.1,  7 NTs,             GAAAAAAGC,score     -12.00, deficit  5.96, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  10.37, ed 99, 2 cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35         
GCUUUUUUCC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_36207.1,  8 NTs,             CCUUUCACG,score     -11.95, deficit  5.96, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   1.82, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s35-s35-s33-s55     
GGGUCAGAAC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_15968.1,  8 NTs,            CAGUCGGUAG,score      -9.84, deficit  4.95, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  25.25, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35-s53-F               
UGAGGACUGG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_38513.1, 10 NTs,            UCAAGCCUAG,score     -11.03, deficit  4.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  11.28, ed 99, 4 cWW-s53-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35           
UAGUGAAGAA 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_96854.1,  9 NTs,            GACUCAACAC,score     -10.55, deficit  3.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.74, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s35                 
CGGUGUUCAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_51090.1,  6 NTs,           CAGCUGGUCAG,score     -13.96, deficit  3.81, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  21.76, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-F                       
CGAGAAAUGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_06048.1,  9 NTs,            CAAGAAAGAG,score     -11.39, deficit  3.48, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   9.59, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35 
GUAUUCGUUC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_37846.1,  7 NTs,            CUCCUCGCUG,score      -9.93, deficit  2.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  23.18, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tWW-s35-s35-s53-s55             
CCGCUAAGAG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_05832.1,  7 NTs,             GCGAAAGAC,score     -12.30, deficit  5.96, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  17.92, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s55-s35     
UUUGAUGUCA 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_30819.1,  8 NTs,            AUUGAGAGCU,score     -11.29, deficit  2.43, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  21.94, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cSH-s35-tSS-s55-s33-s53-s55     
CCACCUAAAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_36552.1,  6 NTs,             CCUCCUAAG,score     -12.94, deficit  6.40, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.87, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s33-F-s55-F                     
CGUGCUGAAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_48376.3,  9 NTs,            CGUGUGGAAG,score     -10.61, deficit  3.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  36.23, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GGCUUUAGGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_99402.3, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score     -12.56, deficit  6.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   4.26, ed 99, 4 cWW-s33-s35-cSH-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35     
CGCUACAAAG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_39334.4,  7 NTs,            CGUUGAAAAG,score     -11.34, deficit  5.02, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  25.51, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s33-s35-s33-cWS-s35-s55 
CGUAGAAAAG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_39334.4,  7 NTs,            CGUUGAAAAG,score      -9.17, deficit  2.85, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  60.45, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s33-s35-s33-cWS-s35-s55 
CCAUAUCCAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_38513.1, 10 NTs,            UCAAGCCUAG,score     -13.11, deficit  6.48, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  16.24, ed 99, 3 cWW-s53-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35           
CAAGGACUCG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_26501.1,  8 NTs,            CAGCUACUCG,score     -11.88, deficit  4.60, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  17.07, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-F-F                 
CGUCGAGCGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_75091.3,  9 NTs,           GUUUGCGGGAC,score     -10.97, deficit  1.09, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  10.28, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
GGAUAGACGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_24323.1, 10 NTs,            GAAGUGCAAC,score     -10.86, deficit  4.42, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   6.01, ed 99, 4 cWW-s33-tWW-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35 
GUCCAUCGUC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_80705.1,  7 NTs,             CUCCUCGCG,score     -12.03, deficit  6.40, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  23.12, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tWW-s35-s35-s53-s55         
CGAUGGUUAG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_81327.2,  5 NTs,            CAGCCGGUAG,score     -13.12, deficit  5.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  26.42, ed 99, 2 cWW-s55-cWS-s35                         
AUAAGACUUU 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_38513.1, 10 NTs,            UCAAGCCUAG,score     -12.14, deficit  5.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  21.49, ed 99, 3 cWW-s53-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35           
UGGGGCUCGA 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_41778.1,  6 NTs,           UAGAGGCCCAG,score     -13.78, deficit  5.90, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   9.26, ed 99, 4 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s35-tSW                 
GGGGACAAUAC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_81820.1, 11 NTs,           UGAAUCCAUAG,score     -13.24, deficit  5.50, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  12.50, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-tSH-s55-tHW-s35-tHW-s33-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
UUUAGAUUCUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_36095.1,  9 NTs,           UUGAUAUGAUG,score     -11.91, deficit  4.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   7.73, ed 99, 4 cWW-s53-s55-s33-F-F-s55                 
GCACCUUAGUC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_04171.2, 10 NTs,           AUGAUAUGGUU,score     -13.79, deficit  6.78, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.09, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35
CGAACAAGCAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_92304.3, 10 NTs,           CUUAGAAGCAG,score     -10.85, deficit  6.44, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  24.87, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-cSW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GUUGAGCGGCC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_30819.1,  8 NTs,            AUUGAGAGCU,score     -12.77, deficit  3.92, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  32.26, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cSH-s35-tSS-s55-s33-s53-s55     
GUAUGAGGUCC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_50622.6, 11 NTs,           CCUUGAGGUGG,score     -15.57, deficit  6.42, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  10.88, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35 
GAUCCAAGAGC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_75091.3,  9 NTs,           GUUUGCGGGAC,score     -14.40, deficit  4.52, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   7.38, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CGCCACUCAAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_94607.1,  7 NTs,           GGCUCAUAACC,score     -11.38, deficit  2.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   7.15, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-s53                   
GUUAAUCCUCC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_67265.4, 10 NTs,           UUUGAUCCUGG,score     -12.14, deficit  4.95, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.67, ed 99, 2 cWW-s33-s35-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CUUUAACGACG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_87219.4, 10 NTs,           GAUUAGAUACC,score     -12.36, deficit  4.83, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  11.79, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
UAGAGAAGCGG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_72714.2, 11 NTs,          UAGGGAACGGGA,score     -14.98, deficit  7.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.40, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CGAACUUUUAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_86843.1,  7 NTs,           AAAGCGGUUAU,score     -11.37, deficit  2.35, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  14.10, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-tSH-s55-s35-s35-s35             
CGUCUGCGAAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_48376.3,  9 NTs,            CGUGUGGAAG,score     -12.41, deficit  5.09, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  23.95, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GAUCGAGGAAC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_91503.2,  9 NTs,           GUUCGUGGAGC,score     -10.03, deficit  3.04, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  35.68, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s33-s35             
CUGAAGUGUUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_04171.2, 10 NTs,           AUGAUAUGGUU,score     -10.79, deficit  3.78, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.11, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35
AGCCACUCUAU 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_75091.3,  9 NTs,           GUUUGCGGGAC,score     -12.42, deficit  2.54, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  20.93, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
GUGUGAAAACC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_87219.4, 10 NTs,           GAUUAGAUACC,score     -11.33, deficit  3.79, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  18.40, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
UAGUUACACGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_98885.3, 10 NTs,           GAAGUGCACAC,score     -13.70, deficit  8.67, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  11.45, ed 99, 3 cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35       
CGCUCAAGAAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_94607.1,  7 NTs,           GGCUCAUAACC,score     -11.38, deficit  2.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  26.67, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-s53                   
GAAAGCCGAAC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_48962.1, 10 NTs,           CAAAAAUGAAG,score     -11.24, deficit  3.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  14.65, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s55-s35-s35-s53         
GAAAAUCACAC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_98885.3, 10 NTs,           GAAGUGCACAC,score     -10.87, deficit  5.84, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  25.63, ed 99, 3 cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35       
GUUUUUAAUUC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_56500.1,  9 NTs,           GUUUUGUAAUC,score      -9.60, deficit  1.90, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  49.07, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s55-cSH-s35         
AUGGACAACCU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_72714.2, 11 NTs,          UAGGGAACGGGA,score     -14.16, deficit  6.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.76, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CGUAGGCUCAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_41778.1,  6 NTs,           UAGAGGCCCAG,score     -17.16, deficit  9.29, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   7.30, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s35-tSW                 
GGGGCUUGAAC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_19239.1,  8 NTs,           CAGCCUGGUAG,score     -11.90, deficit  3.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  11.21, ed 99, 4 cWW-s55-s35-F-F-F-F                     
GUCUCGAAUCC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_32458.2,  9 NTs,           GGUUCGAAUCC,score     -13.11, deficit  5.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  39.37, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35     
GCCAAUUUCAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_43613.3,  7 NTs,           UUUAUUAAAAA,score     -14.74, deficit  8.22, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   8.51, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s53-s35         
GUAUGCGACCC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_32458.2,  9 NTs,           GGUUCGAAUCC,score     -13.39, deficit  5.38, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   5.11, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35     
GGCAGCGAUGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_50622.6, 11 NTs,           CCUUGAGGUGG,score     -15.31, deficit  6.16, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  12.38, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35 
CUCUAUUUUUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_98252.1,  8 NTs,           AUUAUUUAUUU,score     -13.68, deficit  6.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.04, ed 99, 2 cWW-s55-s55-tWW-s35-s53-s35-s55-s53     
CAUUAAAAUAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_49992.1, 10 NTs,           GAUCAGAAUGC,score     -10.21, deficit  2.62, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.36, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
ACCAGGGAAAU 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_31286.3,  9 NTs,           UUUGGGGAAAG,score     -12.31, deficit  6.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  21.87, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GGCAUGGGAGC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_48376.3,  9 NTs,            CGUGUGGAAG,score     -14.41, deficit  7.09, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  10.18, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GUGCGUAAAUC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_91503.2,  9 NTs,           GUUCGUGGAGC,score     -12.15, deficit  5.16, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  24.36, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s33-s35             
CAAAAAACCAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_88982.1,  8 NTs,          CAAAAUAACAAG,score     -10.99, deficit  4.14, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  36.55, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s35-s35             
GUGAAACCGCC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_78061.2, 10 NTs,            CUGCAACCCG,score     -13.11, deficit  8.60, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  21.56, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s33 
GGAAUUUAAAC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_26772.1, 11 NTs,          CGAAUCCAUAAG,score     -12.92, deficit  3.19, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  23.50, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s55-s33-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35
GGAAUCAAGAC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_81820.1, 11 NTs,           UGAAUCCAUAG,score     -14.82, deficit  7.08, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  34.58, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tSH-s55-tHW-s35-tHW-s33-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
AUAAACCGAUU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_53037.1,  8 NTs,           CUAUGGCUAUG,score     -11.92, deficit  3.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   5.90, ed 99, 4 cWW-F-s35-s35-F-s55                     
UUCAACUAGUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_04171.2, 10 NTs,           AUGAUAUGGUU,score     -14.96, deficit  7.95, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   7.26, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35
CAUAAAAAGAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_49992.1, 10 NTs,           GAUCAGAAUGC,score     -13.33, deficit  5.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  29.62, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GGAGAACGGAC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_72714.2, 11 NTs,          UAGGGAACGGGA,score     -13.27, deficit  5.29, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  24.46, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CUGACCGAAAUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_08291.1, 11 NTs,          CUGACCGAUAUG,score      -8.63, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.55, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F
GGAAGUAAAAAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_88982.1,  8 NTs,          CAAAAUAACAAG,score     -11.81, deficit  4.95, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  12.69, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s35-s35             
UGAAAAAAAGGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_02483.1, 10 NTs,          UGAUCACGAAGG,score     -11.99, deficit  4.21, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   3.51, ed 99, 5 cWW-s55-tWH-cSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
GCAAAACUAAAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_19162.2, 12 NTs,          GGAACACUAUAC,score     -12.13, deficit  3.59, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  29.90, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-F-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CGUCGAAAAUGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_11805.2, 11 NTs,           GGUCGGACAUC,score     -13.78, deficit  8.09, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   6.71, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s53-F-s35-s35       
CUAAAACUAUUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_19162.2, 12 NTs,          GGAACACUAUAC,score     -15.01, deficit  6.46, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  13.90, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-F-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CACUAUUCCGCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_43488.1, 11 NTs,          AACGCUUGCGUU,score     -14.09, deficit  5.79, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  10.99, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s33-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-F-F-s35
CUUGGGACUUCG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_25466.1, 11 NTs,          CAUUGCACUCCG,score     -12.08, deficit  4.83, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   9.34, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-F-s35-F-F           
CGGAGACUAUGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_19162.2, 12 NTs,          GGAACACUAUAC,score     -12.83, deficit  4.29, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  26.01, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-F-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CAAAUUCAACAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_07268.1, 11 NTs,          CAAUUUAUACAG,score     -11.86, deficit  3.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  25.34, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s53-s53-s35-s35 
GUCUGUUAGACC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_96423.1, 10 NTs,          UAUCGGUUAGAG,score     -15.76, deficit  6.77, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  14.90, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-F-s35
GCGAAACAAUCC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_19162.2, 12 NTs,          GGAACACUAUAC,score     -12.93, deficit  4.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   8.75, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-F-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
UUGUCUCGAAUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_08291.1, 11 NTs,          CUGACCGAUAUG,score     -15.13, deficit  7.59, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  13.15, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F
CGAUCACUGGAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_19162.2, 12 NTs,          GGAACACUAUAC,score     -12.32, deficit  3.78, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  28.83, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-F-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
AUGUUCAAAAUU 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_60326.1,  9 NTs,         GUUUACCAAAAUC,score     -15.94, deficit  8.11, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   5.43, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s33-s35-s35 
CGCAUCCAUCGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_26772.1, 11 NTs,          CGAAUCCAUAAG,score     -16.65, deficit  6.92, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   0.08, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s55-s33-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35
CGGGGAAAGCGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_72714.2, 11 NTs,          UAGGGAACGGGA,score     -14.48, deficit  6.50, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  18.05, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GAAAGUCACAAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_88982.1,  8 NTs,          CAAAAUAACAAG,score     -10.78, deficit  3.92, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.87, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s35-s35             
AGAGUCAAUGGU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_17956.1,  8 NTs,           UGAUCAAUGAG,score     -18.18, deficit 10.33, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   1.26, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s55-tHS-s33-F-s35-s35   
GAAAAGAAAAAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_88982.1,  8 NTs,          CAAAAUAACAAG,score     -10.20, deficit  3.34, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  41.55, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s35-s35             
GAUACUAAAAAC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_88982.1,  8 NTs,          CAAAAUAACAAG,score     -11.81, deficit  4.95, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  12.69, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s35-s35             
CGAAUAUAUAGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_26772.1, 11 NTs,          CGAAUCCAUAAG,score     -15.04, deficit  5.31, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  10.18, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s55-s33-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35
CAAUAAGACAGGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_81205.2, 14 NTs,        CACUGAGACACGGG,score     -16.12, deficit 11.23, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   0.70, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-F-F-s35
GUAGAAAAAGACC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_89082.1, 11 NTs,         GAAGAAUACGACC,score     -14.19, deficit  9.48, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  12.44, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-F-s35-s35-s35   
UGUCUGUAUACAA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_17086.2, 13 NTs,         AAUGUAAAUACCU,score     -14.69, deficit  3.73, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   2.72, ed 99, 5 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GGAAGGAGGAUAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_49873.1,  8 NTs,         GGAAUCGGUAGAC,score     -13.54, deficit  5.26, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   1.61, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-cWS-s35-cWS-s35-s35-s35 
AGAUCAUGAGGAU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_02483.1, 10 NTs,          UGAUCACGAAGG,score     -17.22, deficit  9.44, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   7.40, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-tWH-cSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
CGAAAAAAAAAGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_19870.4, 11 NTs,         CUAAAAGGUAACG,score     -14.92, deficit  7.73, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   1.36, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s53-tWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CAGAACCCGAAGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_02483.1, 10 NTs,          UGAUCACGAAGG,score     -15.94, deficit  8.16, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  13.81, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-tWH-cSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
CAGUUAAAAACCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_17086.2, 13 NTs,         AAUGUAAAUACCU,score     -11.63, deficit  0.67, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  49.76, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GUCUAAAAAAAUC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_60326.1,  9 NTs,         GUUUACCAAAAUC,score     -11.17, deficit  3.34, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  31.79, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s33-s35-s35 
CACCAGUCCACGG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_58446.1, 12 NTs,        GACCUAGAUCACCC,score     -14.84, deficit  6.97, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   5.14, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s35-tSW-s35-s53-F-F-s35-s35-s35 
GUUUAAAGAAAAUC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_60326.1,  9 NTs,         GUUUACCAAAAUC,score     -14.14, deficit  6.32, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.33, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s33-s35-s35 
GGGCUACGAAGAAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_17086.2, 13 NTs,         AAUGUAAAUACCU,score     -20.92, deficit  9.96, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   1.49, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GGGGCGCUCAGAAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_58733.1, 12 NTs,        CGGAGCGGCUGAAG,score     -14.99, deficit  4.47, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   9.39, ed 99, 4 cWW-s55-s33-s35-s55-s35-F-F-F-F-s35-s35 
GGAGCCGAGACAAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_12571.1, 13 NTs,       CGAGCCUGGUCAAAG,score     -16.31, deficit  7.68, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   1.61, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s55-cWS-s35-tSW-s35-s33-F-F-s35
CUUACUUAUGAACUUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_58539.1, 15 NTs,      UUAAAUUGGGCACUUG,score     -17.32, deficit  7.58, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   9.69, ed 99, 5 cWW-s53-s55-tWS-tHW-F-F-s55-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CUCAACUUGCGACAUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_58539.1, 15 NTs,      UUAAAUUGGGCACUUG,score     -18.42, deficit  8.68, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   5.30, ed 99, 5 cWW-s53-s55-tWS-tHW-F-F-s55-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
4	100.0000	 86.0000	 70.0000	4
5	100.0000	 90.0000	 56.0000	23
6	100.0000	 88.0000	 56.0000	60
7	 98.0000	 60.0000	 12.0000	51
8	100.0000	 28.0000	  4.0000	46
9	100.0000	 14.0000	  0.0000	68
10	 94.0000	 12.0000	  0.0000	41
11	 84.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	42
12	 44.0000	  2.0000	  0.0000	23
13	 20.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	12
14	  8.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	8
15	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	8
16	  4.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	4
17	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	4
18	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	1
19	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	1
20	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	2
21	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	0
22	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	2
23	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	0
24	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	1
25	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	1
26	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	1
27	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	0





Model HL_00317.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  50.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSS-s35-s35-s35-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGGCCUUUCUUAAAAAAAAA
Model HL_01925.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-cHW-cWH-s35-cHW-cWH-s53-s33-cWH-cHW-cWH-s35-cWH-s53-s33-cHW-cWH-tSH-s35-cWH-s53-s33-cHW-s35-s33-s35, sequence CGAAGGGACGGUGCGGAGAGGAGAG
Model HL_03603.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AUUUUGUUGGUUUCU
Model HL_06137.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWH-s33-s33-cHW-cWH-s35-cHW-cWH-cWH-s35-cWH-s33-s55-s55-cHW-s33-cWH-s53-s35-s33-cWH-s53-s35-s33-s55, sequence UGUGGAAGGAGUGGCUGGGUUG
Model HL_07432.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.36%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWS-s35-cSH-s35-s35, sequence CUCAGCAGGUAGAG
Model HL_07579.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  88.89%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UACUUAUUUCCUUUGA
Model HL_08602.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cSS-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-cSS-s35-s55, sequence CAAUCCGCUCUAG
Model HL_12710.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.87%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSH-s55-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAAGCGUAAUAGCUC
Model HL_12773.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.37%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-s55-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUAUUGCAGUACCUC
Model HL_12870.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.39%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tHW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s53-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUCCUUGGGAAAC
Model HL_20751.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.15%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tHW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s55, sequence CAGGGGAGGAAUCG
Model HL_22443.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-F, sequence CCUGAGAAACGG
Model HL_22576.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s55-F-s55-s35-F-s35, sequence CCUAAUUAGUGG
Model HL_28843.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.10%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s35-s35, sequence UGAAGGCAGAAGUAA
Model HL_30585.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.45%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSS-s35-cSW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AGUCGCGUGAUAAAUGU
Model HL_30596.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F-F-s35-F, sequence UCUAUGAUACCA
Model HL_35978.6  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.00%,  12 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence CAUUGCACUCCG
Model HL_38011.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.88%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-F-F-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCUUAGAAGCAGCC
Model HL_42211.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.58%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s55-F-F-F-F-s35, sequence UGGAAUUGGUAGACA
Model HL_46465.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s33-cHW-s55-s35-cWH-s53-s35-cHW-cWH-s53-s35-cWH-s35-cWH-s53-tWW-F-s55-cWH-s35-cWH-s35-tWW-s35-tHH-s53-s35-s53-tSW-s55-s55-s33-cSH-s35-s35, sequence AGGAAGGAUUGGUAUGUGGUAUAU
Model HL_52657.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  75.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-tSH-s33-s55-bif-s35-s35-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGGAUCAGUCACCCAAG
Model HL_56677.4  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.36%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-tWH-s35-tSH-s55-s33-s35-s55-tHW-s35-tHW-s33-tSW-s35-s35-s35-cWH-s53-s35-s35, sequence CUGAACGCAUCUAAG
Model HL_59564.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN 100.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSS-s35-cSS-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGGCCUUUCUUAAAAAAAAA
Model HL_68863.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.64%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F, sequence AGGUGGGGUUUAU
Model HL_74088.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWH-s33-s33-cHW-cWH-s53-s35-cHW-cWH-s53-cWH-s35-cWH-s33-tSW-s55-s55-cHW-s33-cWH-s35-s33-cWH-F-s35-s33-s55-F, sequence UGUGGAAGGAGUGGCUGGGUUG
Model HL_79564.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-cHW-cWH-tSH-s35-cHW-cWH-s53-s33-cWH-cHW-cWH-s35-cWH-s53-s33-cHW-cWH-tSH-s35-cWH-s53-s33-s33-cHW-s35-s33-s35, sequence CGAAGGAGAGGAGAGGAAGAGGAGAG
Model HL_82782.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  60.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-tSH-s33-s55-tHS-s33-F-s55-F-s35-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CUGACCGAAAGGCGUGAUG
Model HL_82866.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  85.71%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-tWW-s35-s35-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s33-s55-s35, sequence CAACUUAGGAUUUUAGG
Model HL_85984.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.87%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-F-s35-s35, sequence UUUCAGAGAUGAGA
Model HL_90257.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F-F-s35-s35, sequence CGAAAAAAUUGGAAGUAG
Model HL_92488.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.65%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s55-s35-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s35-F-s35, sequence GAAACCGCCGAUAUGC
Model HL_93650.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.14%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35, sequence CAUCCGAGUUGCAAG
Model HL_94032.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.06%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UAGUCUCUUUCG
Model HL_98870.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s55-s55-tWW-s35-F-s35-s53-s55-s35-s35, sequence CGUAGGCUACAGAGAAG
Model HL_10751.2  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.62%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-F-s33, sequence CAGCCUGGUAG
Model HL_12571.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.11%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s55-cWS-s35-tSW-s35-s33-F-F-s35, sequence CGAGCCUGGUCAAAG
Model HL_19870.4  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.18%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s53-tWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CUAAAAGGUAACG
Model HL_19958.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-cWS-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUAGUGGUAUC
Model HL_20714.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.93%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AAUGGGAUGUCGU
Model HL_25466.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-F-s35-F-F, sequence CAUUGCACUCCG
Model HL_31581.4  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.95%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s55-s35, sequence CAUUGCACUCCG
Model HL_42671.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.24%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-F-s35-tSS-s55-s33-s35, sequence AGCACGUGAAAUU
Model HL_43488.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-F-F-s35, sequence AACGCUUGCGUU
Model HL_49873.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-cWS-s35-cWS-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGAAUCGGUAGAC
Model HL_58446.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-tSW-s35-s53-F-F-s35-s35-s35, sequence GACCUAGAUCACCC
Model HL_58733.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.07%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s33-s35-s55-s35-F-F-F-F-s35-s35, sequence CGGAGCGGCUGAAG
Model HL_72419.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.12%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUCCCAACGAG
Model HL_72451.4  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.87%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35-s35, sequence GGAACAAC
Model HL_81205.2  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.75%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-F-F-s35, sequence CACUGAGACACGGG
Model HL_86109.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.30%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35, sequence GGGCGGUGGGAGC
Model HL_89082.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.90%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-F-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAGAAUACGACC
Model HL_93221.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.70%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F-F-s35-s35-s35, sequence GACCUAGAUCACCC
Model HL_96423.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.04%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-F-s35, sequence UAUCGGUUAGAG
Model HL_07268.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.89%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s53-s53-s35-s35, sequence CAAUUUAUACAG
Model HL_10536.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s33-F-s35, sequence GUUGGAUAUC
Model HL_20891.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.37%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s53-s33-F-s55-s35-s53-s55, sequence CAAUAUCGAAG
Model HL_23481.4  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-F-s35, sequence GAAACAUC
Model HL_23537.2  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s35-s33-s35-s35, sequence GUCCCAAGCC
Model HL_32255.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s33-cWW-F-cSS-s53-s55-s35, sequence UUUUUUAAUG
Model HL_35188.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-s33-F, sequence CAGCCUGGGAG
Model HL_50537.2  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-bif-F-F-s35-s35, sequence ACUGUUAAU
Model HL_51090.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-F, sequence CAGCUGGUCAG
Model HL_56500.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s55-cSH-s35, sequence GUUUUGUAAUC
Model HL_58539.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  64.71%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-s55-tWS-tHW-F-F-s55-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUAAAUUGGGCACUUG
Model HL_67216.4  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.82%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence CGGCGAG
Model HL_70505.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.66%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWW-s35-s35-s35-F-s55-s35, sequence GAUCAGCCAUGC
Model HL_73235.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-s55, sequence CAGCACUUUG
Model HL_86378.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSH, sequence UUUCGUGUG
Model HL_90620.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-cSW-cSH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AACCGUAAAAU
Model HL_98248.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.71%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s55-s55-tHW-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s35, sequence GUAACUAUGAC
Model HL_03847.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.67%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCUGGCGGUC
Model HL_08510.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSH-s53-s53-F-s55, sequence AUGUGCUUU
Model HL_11805.2  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s53-F-s35-s35, sequence GGUCGGACAUC
Model HL_14725.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s33-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUCAGUGUG
Model HL_17086.2  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AAUGUAAAUACCU
Model HL_18785.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.83%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35, sequence UAAGGG
Model HL_18808.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35, sequence CAAUUGGAUAG
Model HL_19398.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-cWS-s35-cSH-s35, sequence CAAGCGGUAAG
Model HL_26501.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-F-F, sequence CAGCUACUCG
Model HL_36095.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-s55-s33-F-F-s55, sequence UUGAUAUGAUG
Model HL_36421.4  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AGUUCAUAU
Model HL_52853.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-s35-F, sequence CAGGCGGUUAG
Model HL_60326.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.04%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s33-s35-s35, sequence GUUUACCAAAAUC
Model HL_70682.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s53-s33-s35-s55-s35, sequence GUCAAGAUUC
Model HL_73051.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s33-cWH-s35-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAGGAGGUC
Model HL_78061.2  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s33, sequence CUGCAACCCG
Model HL_98252.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s55-tWW-s35-s53-s35-s55-s53, sequence AUUAUUUAUUU
Model HL_02483.1  matched a sequence   4 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-tWH-cSH-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAUCACGAAGG
Model HL_04171.2  matched a sequence   4 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   9 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35, sequence AUGAUAUGGUU
Model HL_08291.1  matched a sequence   4 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F, sequence CUGACCGAUAUG
Model HL_19239.1  matched a sequence   4 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.72%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGCCUGGUAG
Model HL_33239.14 matched a sequence   4 times, TP  96.30%, TN  96.01%, 108 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUUCGAUUC
Model HL_38513.1  matched a sequence   4 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.34%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UCAAGCCUAG
Model HL_50374.1  matched a sequence   4 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence UAAUUCA
Model HL_51284.1  matched a sequence   4 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCAAGGAGAC
Model HL_67205.1  matched a sequence   4 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.63%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-s53, sequence CAUUCG
Model HL_91131.1  matched a sequence   4 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCUUUGGAC
Model HL_92304.3  matched a sequence   4 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.01%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CUUAGAAGCAG
Model HL_92681.4  matched a sequence   4 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAAGAAG
Model HL_01187.1  matched a sequence   5 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.10%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s55-s35, sequence GAAUUAAC
Model HL_05123.1  matched a sequence   5 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACGGGGAGUU
Model HL_19162.2  matched a sequence   5 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-F-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGAACACUAUAC
Model HL_27757.1  matched a sequence   5 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s55-F, sequence CGGAAAGG
Model HL_32458.2  matched a sequence   5 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGUUCGAAUCC
Model HL_37846.1  matched a sequence   5 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWW-s35-s35-s53-s55, sequence CUCCUCGCUG
Model HL_41207.1  matched a sequence   5 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s53-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s53-s33-s35, sequence UCUUUAAAA
Model HL_50622.6  matched a sequence   5 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CCUUGAGGUGG
Model HL_53037.1  matched a sequence   5 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-s35-s35-F-s55, sequence CUAUGGCUAUG
Model HL_53499.1  matched a sequence   5 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-F, sequence CAGCUGGGAG
Model HL_81820.1  matched a sequence   5 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.16%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s55-tHW-s35-tHW-s33-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAAUCCAUAG
Model HL_86843.1  matched a sequence   5 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence AAAGCGGUUAU
Model HL_91503.2  matched a sequence   5 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s33-s35, sequence GUUCGUGGAGC
Model HL_94607.1  matched a sequence   5 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-s53, sequence GGCUCAUAACC
Model HL_97733.1  matched a sequence   5 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s55, sequence CCCGGUCAGG
Model HL_02811.1  matched a sequence   6 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.88%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence AGGGAUUUU
Model HL_15968.1  matched a sequence   6 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35-s53-F, sequence CAGUCGGUAG
Model HL_33172.1  matched a sequence   6 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s55-F, sequence CCUUUCACG
Model HL_35888.1  matched a sequence   6 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.19%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-s35-s35, sequence AGGCAAUU
Model HL_44911.1  matched a sequence   6 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.19%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-F-F, sequence AGGCAAUU
Model HL_48810.1  matched a sequence   6 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-s35-F, sequence CAGCUGGUUAG
Model HL_49194.1  matched a sequence   6 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.93%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGACGAUC
Model HL_49213.1  matched a sequence   6 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s55-s33-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGAAAUGAAC
Model HL_59445.1  matched a sequence   6 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.84%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F-s35-s35, sequence CAAUAGG
Model HL_67044.1  matched a sequence   6 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s33-F-s35, sequence AUGUCGUUU
Model HL_79299.9  matched a sequence   6 times, TP  98.08%, TN  95.66%,  52 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s53-s55, sequence CUUCGG
Model HL_90642.4  matched a sequence   6 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence GUGAAGAUGC
Model HL_93436.1  matched a sequence   6 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.84%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-F-s35-s35, sequence GUUCGAUCC
Model HL_98885.3  matched a sequence   6 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAGUGCACAC
Model HL_01008.4  matched a sequence   7 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   9 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-F, sequence GAUCAC
Model HL_08002.5  matched a sequence   7 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  14 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-F-F-s35-s35, sequence GUAGAGUC
Model HL_08748.1  matched a sequence   7 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-F-s35-s35, sequence ACUCAUACU
Model HL_26772.1  matched a sequence   7 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s55-s33-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGAAUCCAUAAG
Model HL_31286.3  matched a sequence   7 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUUGGGGAAAG
Model HL_46891.2  matched a sequence   7 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,  11 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AUGGUUGU
Model HL_48962.1  matched a sequence   7 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.92%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s55-s35-s35-s53, sequence CAAAAAUGAAG
Model HL_56089.1  matched a sequence   7 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWW-s35-F-F-s35, sequence CCGAAUAG
Model HL_58200.1  matched a sequence   7 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s55, sequence CCUCACACG
Model HL_59710.7  matched a sequence   7 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,  32 instances, signature cWW-s35-bif-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCUCAUAAC
Model HL_60140.1  matched a sequence   7 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-bif-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACUGAAGAU
Model HL_76406.3  matched a sequence   7 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s53-s53-cWH-s55-s35, sequence GACAGAGAC
Model HL_88982.1  matched a sequence   7 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s35-s35, sequence CAAAAUAACAAG
Model HL_96854.1  matched a sequence   7 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s35, sequence GACUCAACAC
Model HL_97049.1  matched a sequence   7 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-cSH, sequence CAGUCGGUAG
Model HL_09712.1  matched a sequence   8 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F, sequence UUCUGCGG
Model HL_17956.1  matched a sequence   8 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s55-tHS-s33-F-s35-s35, sequence UGAUCAAUGAG
Model HL_24323.1  matched a sequence   8 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s33-tWW-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAGUGCAAC
Model HL_27359.1  matched a sequence   8 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s55, sequence CAGCCUGGUAG
Model HL_29487.1  matched a sequence   8 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.79%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-F-s35-s55, sequence CUGAUG
Model HL_30937.1  matched a sequence   8 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.92%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUAACGC
Model HL_34135.1  matched a sequence   8 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUUUUGAUA
Model HL_36207.1  matched a sequence   8 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.92%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s35-s35-s33-s55, sequence CCUUUCACG
Model HL_38646.2  matched a sequence   8 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGUAAUGC
Model HL_46463.1  matched a sequence   8 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.57%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence UUUCGA
Model HL_49223.1  matched a sequence   8 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.89%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAAAAAGC
Model HL_49992.1  matched a sequence   8 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAUCAGAAUGC
Model HL_63693.1  matched a sequence   8 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGCAUAACAA
Model HL_67265.4  matched a sequence   8 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   8 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUUGAUCCUGG
Model HL_68478.1  matched a sequence   8 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.92%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-s35, sequence GCUUGC
Model HL_73793.2  matched a sequence   8 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAUAAAAGC
Model HL_78457.3  matched a sequence   8 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUUAAUAUUC
Model HL_80705.1  matched a sequence   8 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWW-s35-s35-s53-s55, sequence CUCCUCGCG
Model HL_81327.2  matched a sequence   8 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35, sequence CAGCCGGUAG
Model HL_88225.1  matched a sequence   8 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s35, sequence CAGGGGUAG
Model HL_02733.4  matched a sequence   9 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence CAUGCCG
Model HL_05832.1  matched a sequence   9 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s55-s35, sequence GCGAAAGAC
Model HL_06920.1  matched a sequence   9 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUUUCUAC
Model HL_30819.1  matched a sequence   9 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSH-s35-tSS-s55-s33-s53-s55, sequence AUUGAGAGCU
Model HL_35491.2  matched a sequence   9 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence GAAACAC
Model HL_37407.1  matched a sequence   9 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35, sequence GAGUAUC
Model HL_37694.1  matched a sequence   9 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-F-s35, sequence GUUCGAAUC
Model HL_44769.1  matched a sequence   9 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.74%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGCACGGAG
Model HL_55046.1  matched a sequence   9 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s55, sequence GUUUAUC
Model HL_59297.1  matched a sequence   9 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.57%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-F-F, sequence GCUUAGGC
Model HL_72714.2  matched a sequence   9 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.93%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UAGGGAACGGGA
Model HL_83225.1  matched a sequence   9 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.88%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence CGUAUUG
Model HL_06645.1  matched a sequence  10 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-F-F-s35, sequence CUUCAACG
Model HL_27747.3  matched a sequence  10 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.86%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s53-s55-cSH, sequence AGAAAUU
Model HL_30541.1  matched a sequence  10 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.29%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-F-F, sequence CAUUCG
Model HL_33612.1  matched a sequence  10 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWH-F-F-s55, sequence CUUUUGG
Model HL_41778.1  matched a sequence  10 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s35-tSW, sequence UAGAGGCCCAG
Model HL_43074.14 matched a sequence  10 times, TP  97.44%, TN  95.97%, 273 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAAAA
Model HL_43613.3  matched a sequence  10 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s53-s35, sequence UUUAUUAAAAA
Model HL_99402.3  matched a sequence  10 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-cSH-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGAUUACCUG
Model HL_01181.4  matched a sequence  11 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCACCGUC
Model HL_03427.1  matched a sequence  11 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.93%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-s35-s33, sequence UCUCAUAAG
Model HL_06048.1  matched a sequence  11 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35, sequence CAAGAAAGAG
Model HL_18495.1  matched a sequence  11 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACUGCAGAU
Model HL_23090.1  matched a sequence  11 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGACAUAAG
Model HL_26055.5  matched a sequence  11 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  15 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUUUCUAC
Model HL_27335.1  matched a sequence  11 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35, sequence ACUGCAGAU
Model HL_32512.6  matched a sequence  11 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,  16 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GACUGGC
Model HL_41285.1  matched a sequence  11 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.81%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-s35, sequence GAACUC
Model HL_41851.1  matched a sequence  11 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s33-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence CCUUACGAG
Model HL_60357.1  matched a sequence  11 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.87%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35, sequence GUAUUC
Model HL_66703.1  matched a sequence  11 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s53-s35, sequence UGGCUAAAA
Model HL_68742.1  matched a sequence  11 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.78%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CUUGCCAAG
Model HL_73266.3  matched a sequence  11 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,  12 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-cSW-cSH-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACCGUAAAU
Model HL_77081.1  matched a sequence  11 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.75%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSW-s35-s55-s35, sequence UGAAAAG
Model HL_78724.1  matched a sequence  11 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.88%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-s35-s35-s35, sequence AAAAUCACU
Model HL_84050.1  matched a sequence  11 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSH-s55, sequence CCAGUUAG
Model HL_17899.1  matched a sequence  12 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-tSW-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUGUCUAC
Model HL_34974.1  matched a sequence  12 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s55-s55, sequence CUUCGG
Model HL_48376.3  matched a sequence  12 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGUGUGGAAG
Model HL_49816.1  matched a sequence  12 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s55-s33, sequence GAAAGACC
Model HL_51033.1  matched a sequence  12 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s55-s35, sequence GGUCUC
Model HL_55511.1  matched a sequence  12 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s53, sequence UAACGGUAG
Model HL_61092.1  matched a sequence  12 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   8 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-F-F, sequence CAGUUGGGAG
Model HL_63285.1  matched a sequence  12 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-tSH-s35-s35-F-s35, sequence GUUAAAAC
Model HL_90961.1  matched a sequence  12 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s55, sequence CGCAUAG
Model HL_93229.1  matched a sequence  12 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence CCUUGAG
Model HL_94651.1  matched a sequence  12 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSS-s35-s55, sequence CGUUCUAG
Model HL_24403.1  matched a sequence  13 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.38%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAAAUC
Model HL_28085.1  matched a sequence  13 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.72%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-F, sequence CAGUAAAUG
Model HL_39334.4  matched a sequence  13 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s33-s35-s33-cWS-s35-s55, sequence CGUUGAAAAG
Model HL_46771.1  matched a sequence  13 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSW-tSS-cSS-s55-s35, sequence AUUGAAAAU
Model HL_53760.2  matched a sequence  13 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  10 instances, signature cWW-s35-bif-s33-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGUAAGUUC
Model HL_54035.5  matched a sequence  13 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   9 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence AUUGAGUU
Model HL_67052.1  matched a sequence  13 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-bif-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACUCUAAAU
Model HL_68493.4  matched a sequence  13 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,  11 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence CUGGGAUG
Model HL_69774.3  matched a sequence  13 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.65%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s33-tSW-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAACAC
Model HL_88858.1  matched a sequence  13 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-bif-s35-tSW-s55-s35, sequence CCUGAUAAG
Model HL_90197.1  matched a sequence  13 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.69%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35, sequence UGUAGG
Model HL_93573.1  matched a sequence  13 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.52%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s35, sequence CCUUGUG
Model HL_01472.3  matched a sequence  14 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSW-F-s55-s53, sequence GUCCGGC
Model HL_05018.4  matched a sequence  14 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAGACCAC
Model HL_12053.1  matched a sequence  14 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.41%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35, sequence CGCAACG
Model HL_35010.1  matched a sequence  14 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35-cSH-s35-s35, sequence CUUGCAAAG
Model HL_36552.1  matched a sequence  14 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-F-s55-F, sequence CCUCCUAAG
Model HL_66171.2  matched a sequence  14 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35, sequence CGACACAG
Model HL_68529.1  matched a sequence  14 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.84%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence GAGUCC
Model HL_69677.1  matched a sequence  14 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.85%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-F, sequence CUUUUUG
Model HL_72066.1  matched a sequence  14 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-tWH-s33-F-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGUUCAAAG
Model HL_80105.3  matched a sequence  14 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.90%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACUUCGGU
Model HL_23219.1  matched a sequence  15 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-cSH-s55-cWH-s35-s53-s55, sequence CGUUAAUG
Model HL_44781.1  matched a sequence  15 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.24%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-cWH-s53-s35-s35, sequence GUUCAC
Model HL_48636.1  matched a sequence  15 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-F-cWH-s55, sequence UGUGAGAGG
Model HL_49196.2  matched a sequence  15 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s33-s55-s35, sequence AUUCCCAUU
Model HL_50959.1  matched a sequence  15 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAUGAG
Model HL_52240.1  matched a sequence  15 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.40%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence AAAUUU
Model HL_86769.2  matched a sequence  15 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSH-s55, sequence AGGGUCAU
Model HL_96487.1  matched a sequence  15 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.42%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence CAUGUAG
Model HL_15942.4  matched a sequence  16 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.34%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35, sequence UUUAGG
Model HL_16845.5  matched a sequence  16 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35, sequence CUUAUCG
Model HL_17926.4  matched a sequence  16 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGUAAGUAA
Model HL_20743.2  matched a sequence  16 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-s55-s35, sequence GGAUAUGGC
Model HL_35894.3  matched a sequence  16 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSW-s33-F-s35, sequence UAGUAA
Model HL_43610.4  matched a sequence  16 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-s35, sequence GGAGACC
Model HL_44730.2  matched a sequence  16 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.96%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence CCUUGG
Model HL_58912.1  matched a sequence  16 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.19%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F, sequence CUGUUG
Model HL_75091.3  matched a sequence  16 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUUUGCGGGAC
Model HL_87219.4  matched a sequence  16 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,  11 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAUUAGAUACC
Model HL_93551.1  matched a sequence  16 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s53-F-s35-s35-s55, sequence CAUGGACG
Model HL_24625.1  matched a sequence  17 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.01%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s53-s55, sequence CAGUG
Model HL_25183.1  matched a sequence  17 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.06%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35, sequence CUGUUCG
Model HL_69818.1  matched a sequence  17 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.47%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSW-s35-s55, sequence UGUAAG
Model HL_93727.3  matched a sequence  17 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  22 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGUGGCUC
Model HL_42733.3  matched a sequence  19 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGGCGAAAG
Model HL_25660.1  matched a sequence  20 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.45%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-F-s35, sequence CGAAUAG
Model HL_62869.2  matched a sequence  20 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.78%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence GGGAAC
Model HL_83704.1  matched a sequence  20 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-cSS-s35-F, sequence GGUGAAUGAC
Model HL_00996.1  matched a sequence  21 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.30%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence GUCUUC
Model HL_46142.7  matched a sequence  21 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.37%,  20 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUACUUGA
Model HL_98995.6  matched a sequence  21 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.01%,   9 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UACCAA
Model HL_43527.1  matched a sequence  22 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.16%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGCCGAG
Model HL_82678.2  matched a sequence  22 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.99%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-F, sequence CAUGUGG
Model HL_14859.1  matched a sequence  23 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.15%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F-F-F, sequence GGAAAC
Model HL_80171.1  matched a sequence  23 times, TP 100.00%, TN  88.43%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-s35-s35-s33, sequence GUCUC
Model HL_96283.1  matched a sequence  23 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.53%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CUUAUG
Model HL_69941.1  matched a sequence  24 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.16%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence CGCGUG
Model HL_32617.1  matched a sequence  25 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.75%,   9 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSH, sequence UUGGUA
Model HL_32527.2  matched a sequence  26 times, TP 100.00%, TN  90.59%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35, sequence GGAAAC
Model HL_56387.1  matched a sequence  26 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.44%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWH-s35-s53-s55, sequence AUUUU
Model HL_53189.1  matched a sequence  27 times, TP 100.00%, TN  85.51%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s53, sequence CUCUG
Model HL_40469.1  matched a sequence  28 times, TP 100.00%, TN  90.30%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F, sequence CGAAUAG
Model HL_14286.1  matched a sequence  30 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.89%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-F-F-s35, sequence CGGAUG
Model HL_76360.1  matched a sequence  30 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.19%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence GUGUCC
Model HL_04891.1  matched a sequence  31 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.73%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGAGAG
Model HL_69459.1  matched a sequence  31 times, TP 100.00%, TN  82.89%,   1 instances, signature cWW, sequence CGCGUG
Model HL_96776.2  matched a sequence  31 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.95%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-F, sequence AAAAUU
Model HL_12703.2  matched a sequence  32 times, TP 100.00%, TN  88.54%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence GGCCC
Model HL_18218.2  matched a sequence  32 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.92%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-bif-F-F-s35, sequence GCCUAGGAC
Model HL_70970.1  matched a sequence  32 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.28%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-s35, sequence UCUAA
Model HL_33507.2  matched a sequence  33 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.01%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-F-s55, sequence UUUUA
Model HL_86880.4  matched a sequence  34 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.90%,  12 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCUCGUC
Model HL_16898.2  matched a sequence  35 times, TP 100.00%, TN  88.99%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s55, sequence UGAAAGG
Model HL_22515.1  matched a sequence  35 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.44%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-F, sequence UGAAAA
Model HL_02361.5  matched a sequence  36 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.81%,  16 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAACAA
Model HL_28567.3  matched a sequence  37 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.35%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence GAGUAC
Model HL_79272.2  matched a sequence  37 times, TP 100.00%, TN  79.73%,  11 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35, sequence CGCAG
Model HL_53987.3  matched a sequence  39 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.17%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWS-s35, sequence CUUAG
Model HL_94352.4  matched a sequence  39 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.05%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F-F, sequence CUAAGUG
Model HL_36982.3  matched a sequence  42 times, TP 100.00%, TN  78.34%,  10 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CUGUG
Model HL_57204.1  matched a sequence  42 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.20%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-F-F-s35, sequence UGGAAA
Model HL_46546.1  matched a sequence  43 times, TP 100.00%, TN  83.15%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s33-F-s35, sequence CUUG
Model HL_05692.1  matched a sequence  48 times, TP 100.00%, TN  81.31%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CGUAGG
Model HL_62604.1  matched a sequence  48 times, TP 100.00%, TN  86.94%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s53-s53-s35, sequence UGAAAA
Model HL_95237.1  matched a sequence  49 times, TP 100.00%, TN  77.95%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35, sequence UUUGA
Model HL_61984.1  matched a sequence  50 times, TP 100.00%, TN  77.73%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CUCGG
Model HL_06569.1  matched a sequence  51 times, TP 100.00%, TN  82.49%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35, sequence AGAAUU
Model HL_57052.2  matched a sequence  52 times, TP 100.00%, TN  75.19%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35, sequence GUCAC
Model HL_60914.1  matched a sequence  52 times, TP 100.00%, TN  77.56%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence CUGGG
Model HL_68304.6  matched a sequence  52 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.45%,   8 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGACGAG
Model HL_99223.1  matched a sequence  55 times, TP 100.00%, TN  76.92%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s33-s55-s35, sequence UUUAA
Model HL_02906.1  matched a sequence  57 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.26%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s35, sequence UGUAAG
Model HL_94386.1  matched a sequence  57 times, TP 100.00%, TN  82.73%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-F-F-s35, sequence GUGAAGC
Model HL_69353.6  matched a sequence  62 times, TP 100.00%, TN  68.81%,  17 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CUAG
Model HL_98557.4  matched a sequence  70 times, TP 100.00%, TN  70.07%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CAGAG
Model HL_18722.1  matched a sequence  79 times, TP 100.00%, TN  66.50%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-F, sequence GUCUC
Model HL_05667.1  matched a sequence  84 times, TP 100.00%, TN  67.15%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55, sequence GGUAC
Model HL_22447.1  matched a sequence 107 times, TP 100.00%, TN  66.20%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s53-s55, sequence UUUUCA
Overall false positive rate is 35.5000%
Number of models giving false positives is 276 out of 310
Rate at which sequences have interior edit distance 0 is     8.25
Rate at which sequences have cutoff score greater than 50 is    15.83
